🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.